{"id":39990,"date":"2014-09-30T23:00:56","date_gmt":"2014-09-30T13:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/09\/30\/reading-hegel-part-5-on-the-unhappy-consciousness-2\/"},"modified":"2019-09-05T04:53:24","modified_gmt":"2019-09-05T04:53:24","slug":"reading-hegel-part-5-on-the-unhappy-consciousness-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/09\/30\/reading-hegel-part-5-on-the-unhappy-consciousness-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Reading Hegel [part 5] on “The Unhappy Consciousness”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2190<\/a> Continuing to read\u00a0Hegel’s\u00a0Phenomenology of Spirit<\/em>, the last part of the chapter “Self-Consciousness”. By this point, consciousness has evolved from skepticism\u00a0–<\/em>\u00a0in which all that it is and that it experiences it knows to be just thought\u00a0–\u00a0into the unhappy consciousness<\/em><\/strong> (UHC<\/strong>). The skeptic<\/a> lived in constant motion between two contradictory positions, that (a) it is the ever-changing thoughts, versus (b) it is the unchangeable essential core of thoughts. The UHC retains this dichotomy, but considers itself to be just that<\/em>. UHC is, for itself and by its own definition, a contradictory dualism.<\/p>\n

Foreshadowing: I was very much not impressed by this section of Hegel’s text. It started off fine, but became increasingly obtuse and vague. Then, conferring some secondary texts, I realized that Hegel is trying to do two things. First, progress the phenomenological project, and take consciousness beyond its current contradiction. But (secondly) he is also pushing his ideas on religion, especially the history of Christianity as he sees it (and as he studied it in earlier decades). This second parallel goal is not explicitly defined, and this forces the narrative to take all sorts of turns and employ all sorts of ideas and conceptual trajectories that it would not have made sense otherwise. This is not the first time I’ve faced Hegel contorting the text to suit some theory he has, but this has been the worst for me so for.<\/p>\n

For my plans to summarize the text and its ideas, this means a shorter and abbreviated writeup. Essentially I intend to virtually skip everything that is not necessary for getting consciousness to the next chapter.<\/p>\n

The initial challenge for unhappy consciousness<\/h3>\n

The unhappy consciousness (UHC) sees it is divided into essential\/immutable and unessential\/changeable sides. But over this perspective, it sees itself as unessential since it is aware of this contradiction, but then again, it sees itself as the unchanging awareness of all this. This indicates to the UHC that it should get rid of the unessential element, which is impossible since its very identity means containing both of them. Thus:<\/p>\n

\n

But inasmuch as the two are equally essential to the\u00a0Unhappy Consciousness and are mutually contradictory, that consciousness\u00a0is merely the contradictory movement in which the opposite does not\u00a0come to rest in its opposite, but only generates itself anew in it as an opposite. [208]<\/span>*<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

It’s life is unhappy since to think about life is to see the unessential in itself, which (per above) leads to seeing the changeless, and then to be frustrated in that goal. The progress it\u00a0does<\/em> make, is to see that this changelessness is of an individuality, and when the UHC relates to it, it relates to it as one individual to another. That other, essential and changeless individual, is however realized as being beyond integration, and thus can only be a target of aspiration (and later devotion\/worship).<\/p>\n

A few words on unhappy consciousness and religion<\/strong><\/h3>\n

This section of text becomes increasingly infused with allusions and implications of Christian theology and history. Not every reference is clear, but here is a\u00a0sample quote that \u00a0is obviously referencing the trinity:<\/p>\n

\n

The movement in which the unessential consciousness strives to attain this oneness is itself threefold in accordance with the threefold relation this consciousness will have with its incarnate beyond : first, as pure consciousness ; second, as a particular individual who approaches the actual world in the forms of desire and work ; and third, as consciousness that is aware of its own being-for-self. [214]<\/span>*<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Various Christian ideas arise in this text. Including explicit mention of devotion and asceticism and ministers, as well as implied allusion to trends in Christian history, including the crusades (seeking and failing to reunite to Jesus, thus must seek unity via religious communities) and the medieval church\u00a0(that subordinates men who in a manner analogous with the\u00a0master’s slave<\/a>, are thus led to realize the universal within themselves).<\/p>\n

The general idea is that the UHC posits its own unchanging essential aspect as being beyond incorporation, and yet as being individualized, and this can be seen in Christianity which posits a god that is beyond and which men try to relate to, but ultimately fail. They fail because their religion is not authentic; an authentic religion would be one that treated god as the Geist, and hence man as an integral expression of god.<\/p>\n

In an essay about this section, Leo Rauch hears\u00a0Hegel saying\u00a0that religion “is the outward projection of individual psychic elements”, and “we must regard [this religion] as the epiphenomenon of consciousness in the dialectical clash between its component essences”. Since it is unable “to grasp itself in any conclusive\u00a0manner, the Unhappy Consciousness finds a way of saying what it\u00a0must on another plane – religion.” [Ch.8<\/a>]\n

And Charles Taylor\u00a0in his\u00a0book<\/a> mentions that this difficulty faced by the UHC trying to unify with the transcendental, as a theory, is the origin of the Feuerbachian<\/a> and Marxian conception of religious consciousness as alienated (nb. those two had a different conception of religion than Hegel, as they anthropomorphized Geist into a generic man).<\/p>\n

Overcoming unhappy consciousness<\/strong><\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. Unhappy consciousness (UHC) is a dyad of [a] the immutable self-identical subject of thought, and [b] the individual who is subject to the changeable world.<\/li>\n
  2. However, he identifies himself as [1] a particular\u00a0containing the inessential mutable; whereas [2] he projects the immutable into a beyond.<\/li>\n
  3. Consequentially UHC feels that division (i.e. of [a\/b] caused by [2]) as a loss, and yearns to be reunited with the immutable. But qua individual\/particular he cannot possibly be reunited with the unchanging.<\/li>\n
  4. And thus is forever seeking ways to relate to the projected immutable.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    That is the end of “Self-consciousness”; the third chapter of the book is “Reason”. Rational thought will realize that the immutable is not divorced from the self, since everything (all of reality) has rational thought underlying it; both the self and the world it perceives are due to rational necessity, and it is this rational necessity which it had thought to be an immutable beyond and now realizes is intimately integral to it individually.<\/p>\n

    Post-script<\/strong><\/p>\n

    There were various reasons for my negative impression of this section of writing in\u00a0The Phenomenology of Spirit<\/em>:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • As I mentioned above, it was as if there was a second author pushing his own agenda, with resulting trajectories, as well as necessary vagueness (or increased range of potential meaning) necessary to fit the alternative narrative. For me, this was\u00a0the<\/em>\u00a0principle source of aggravation.<\/li>\n
    • I was not convinced that this stage (i.e. UHC) was necessary; couldn’t the skeptic consciousness transform straight into Reason?<\/li>\n
    • And apropos, isn’t the dyad of the UHC already present in skepticism (and hence redundant)?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Reading Hegel about a form of consciousness he calls “unhappy”, because not only does it define itself as a dichotomy, but it divides and separates the aspect of itself that it feels to be unchangeable and essential. This leaves a self that sees itself as a changing transience, and that strives to relate to the truth, i.e. to the unchanging aspect of itself which was divested, and Hegel sees this played out in religion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[159,90,302,18,39,20],"tags":[21,36,19,37],"metadata":[],"class_list":["post-39990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-posts","category-blog-posts","category-classicalphilosophers","category-hegel","category-meanwhileiii","category-philosophy","tag-charles-taylor","tag-leo-rauch","tag-phenomenology-of-spirit","tag-religion"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2902,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/10\/07\/notes-on-hegel-pos-unhappy-consciousness\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":0},"title":"Notes on Hegel “PoS” Unhappy Consciousness","author":"Pala","date":"October 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"[207\/42] Stb: The UC is *like* a spirt, in that it contains two parts, and also their unity. But it is not aware of this, and so experiences itself as both, then as one when it identifies itself as both, but thus returns again. The \"two\" I'm referring to are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":182,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/10\/12\/reading-hegel-part-6-introducing-reason\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":1},"title":"Reading Hegel [part 6] Introducing “Reason”","author":"Pala","date":"October 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"In Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, consciousness evolves into \"Reason\" - a mode of thought that considers everything that is, including itself, to be determined by rationality. This concerns the introductory material of C.AA.V \"The certainty and truth of reason\",\u00a0\u00a7231-243. The unchanging certainty of reason Before this point, the ascent of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":112,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/09\/27\/reading-hegel-part-4-on-stoicism-and-skepticism\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":2},"title":"Reading Hegel [part 4] on “Stoicism” and “Skepticism”","author":"Pala","date":"September 27, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Reading Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit for the first time. Here I've read the first part of section B \"Self-consciousness\", chapter IV \"The truth of self-certainty\", part B \"Freedom of self-consciousness\". That elaborate indexing adumbrates the topic matter: Hegel's studying a self-conscious entity, whose basis for truth is its certainty of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3631,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/10\/22\/hegel-index\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":3},"title":"Hegel Index","author":"Pala","date":"October 22, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"This is an index for all my posts on Hegel. The order of publication is indicated by the numbering and otherwise this order basically follows the Phenomenology of Spirit. Contextualizing Hegel's Philosophy\u00a0[4] Reading Hegel on \"Sense Certainty\"\u00a0[1] Taylor Reading Hegel on \"Sense Certainty\"\u00a0[5] Reading Hegel on \"Desire\"\u00a0[2] Reading Hegel on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":179,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/10\/01\/thinking-about-unhappy-consciousness-and-gods-dogs\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":4},"title":"Thinking About Unhappy Consciousness (and God’s Dogs)","author":"Pala","date":"October 1, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"When I first read Hegel on \"the unhappy consciousness\", I struggled to make sense of it; a strange conversation gave it new meaning. The epiphany came about as we started talking about why dogs are so happy; why a dog's life can be said to be perfect, and enviable too!\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4019,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/09\/08\/reading-hegel-on-sense-certainty\/","url_meta":{"origin":39990,"position":5},"title":"Reading Hegel on “Sense-Certainty”","author":"Pala","date":"September 8, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Editorial notes: In September 2014, Shai publishes his fifth\u00a0blog\u00a0entitled \u201cM-III\u201d (short for Meantime-III) and subtitled \u201cThe Traveller is the Journey\u201d (not to be confused with a later blog entitled \u201cThe Traveller is the Journey\u201d, published in 2015). In the 'About' page of the blog, Shai shares his observations on his\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/padotI-ap0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39990\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39990"},{"taxonomy":"metadata","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/metadata?post=39990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}