{"id":1759,"date":"2011-01-08T11:52:29","date_gmt":"2011-01-08T11:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2018\/11\/28\/2-revision-v1\/"},"modified":"2019-07-10T12:11:58","modified_gmt":"2019-07-10T12:11:58","slug":"the-seven-beauties-of-science-fiction-br-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2011\/01\/08\/the-seven-beauties-of-science-fiction-br-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction (BR)"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Seven Beauties of\u00a0Science Fiction<\/em>\u00a0is a book written by\u00a0Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr, a professor of English at\u00a0DePauw University\u00a0and published in 2008.<\/p>\n

I wanted to have a bird’s eye view;
\nI ended up in outer space.<\/em>\u00a0(Preface)<\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There’s something\u00a0inexpressible\u00a0about\u00a0SF<\/a>[1]<\/sup><\/a>. This\u00a0inexpressible something<\/a>, the author suggests, reflects the role of SF in helping us parse and express the role and change of science in\u00a0our<\/em>\u00a0world. Although counter-intuitive, it rings true to say that more than any other genre SF is about the here and now, divulging our struggle to come to terms with the ever-expanding\u00a0possibilities<\/a>\u00a0of the world.<\/p>\n

It is from SF’s thesaurus of images that we draw many of our metaphors and models for understanding our technologized world, and it is as SF that many of our impressions of technology-aided desire and technology-riven anxiety are processed back into works of the imagination.\u00a0(Introduction)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To help consider how SF reflects and refracts our perception of the world, Csicsery-Rony describes an attitude he calls\u00a0science fictionality<\/em>. Science fictionality is characterised by a pair of gaps: (1) the gap “between the conceivability of future tranSFormations and the possibility of their actualization”; (2) the gap between the imminent possibility of those transformations and “reflection about their possible ethical, social, and spiritual consequences”.<\/p>\n

Having explained SF as an attitude towards our perception of science in the world, the author goes on to outline the seven eponymous beauties of the book; seven categories that are are used to construct and express SF<\/strong>. Elaborating on these forms the bulk of the book. I’ll be summarising these briefly below, skipping the many tangential discussions aside from a few.<\/p>\n

\n

I\u00a0Fictive neology<\/h4>\n

These are the\u00a0new words and signs<\/a>\u00a0that show up in SF. They reflect our expectation that changes to the world, whether technological or social, impact language. They’re important not only for representing something new, like a new product, but by directly being new. There is something tantalising about new words, and doubly so when we need to integrate both the word and what it represents into a modified worldview.<\/p>\n

If SF is a quintessentially estranging genre, it is in imaginary neologies that this estrangement is most economically condensed. Imaginary neologies stand out from other words as knots of estrangement, drawing together the threads of imaginary reference with those of known language.\u00a0(First Beauty)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It’s interesting to note that in practice, fictive neologies are predominantly nouns. This is no surprise: for every newly coined verb that’s permeated our language in response to technology (from “google” to “text”), there are countless nouns, especially products (everything from “iPhone”, “stem cells” and on).<\/p>\n

Familiar verbs allow unfamiliar\u00a0objects and concepts\u00a0to be handled in familiar ways, but a novel verb presents a nearly physical challenge of having to imagine new ways of actively experiencing and manipulating a world[.]\u00a0(First Beauty)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

II\u00a0Fictive novums<\/h4>\n

The idea of the\u00a0novum\u00a0in SF originates in\u00a0Darko Suvin; it is an “unprecedented and unpredicted ‘new thing’ that intervenes in the routine course of social life and changes the trajectory of history”. More obviously, it is that (or\u00a0those<\/em>) technologies or discoveries that drive a SF tale (whether it be a\u00a0Death Star\u00a0or a hostile\u00a0AI<\/a>, etc).<\/p>\n

The novum is a narratological mega\u00a0trope, a figural device that so “dominates” [its] fiction, that every significant aspect of the narrative’s meaning can be derived from it: the estranged conditions caused by a radically new thing, the thematic unity of the work, and even changes in readers’ attitudes towards their own world, after reading.\u00a0(Second Beauty)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Thus a novum is useful for explaining what it is about an SF story that makes it tick. It also suggests a distinction (with exceptions) between SF and fantasy. Sf rewards a sparsity of novums while fantasy revels in them; fantasy opposes SF in romanticizing the lawlessness, and so plurality, of the world. The concept of the novum is similarly opposed in SF vs sci-fi1<\/sup>:<\/p>\n

[T]he popular quasi-novums of sci-fi are both\u00a0less<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0more<\/a>\u00a0than rational. They are arbitrary devices constructed for spectacular effects that use the image and jargon from the archive of conventional science-fictional performances of the past. They are intended to create the feeling that novums are intrusions from the\u00a0anima mundi<\/em>\u00a0or supernature that have been forced to adapt to contemporary conditions. They also exceed scientific rationality by claiming that scientific discourse can comprehend and penetrate the supernatural and the surreal. In this sense, they merely exaggerate the inherent rationalization at the heart of SF’s novum-construction, calling attention to the fact that novums in SF are\u00a0novum effects<\/em>, just as SF’s putative provision of rational cognition is itself actually a\u00a0cognition effect<\/em>.\u00a0(Second Beauty)<\/small><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

III\u00a0Future History<\/h4>\n

The SF novum trails its future behind it, tranSForming the reader’s present from just another moment continuous with the past into the prehistory of the future. In that move it also initiates a new past. As the novum breaks up an old history it founds a new one, back-propagated to be continuous with the future implied by the novum’s potentials. New things reverse the flow of historical time. They create the past from the perspective of the future. Each SF tale embeds its action in a history told from the future, sometimes explicitly explained, more often artfully implied.\u00a0(Third Beauty)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

IV\u00a0Imaginary Science<\/h4>\n

This is the most obvious facet of SF: it is the fiction of science. Sf may refer to real-world science, or attempt to derive from it, or even completely invent it, the important thing is that its still science. The SF world is one predicted and predicated by the scientific viewpoint.<\/p>\n

It is here, in imagining science, that SF most tangibly affects the real world. On one hand SF expresses our fears to affect our society’s dialogue (eg.\u00a0fear of genetic eugenics<\/a>\u00a0influencing\u00a0anti-genetic-discrimination legislation), and on the other hand, SF props up fields of research by imagining their future value (eg.\u00a0nanotechnology). Less obviously, SF’s imaginations provide a mythology of the future that can justify the present (consider the popularity of\u00a0Star Trek<\/em>\u00a0and its techno-utopianism).<\/p>\n

For nonscientists, the only thing that distinguishes\u00a0exotic matter\u00a0from\u00a0Flubber\u00a0is the sophistication of its rationalization, and the only difference between exotic physical theories and SF is the social authority behind the former.\u00a0(Fourth Beauty)<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

V\u00a0The Science-Fic<\/a>tional Sublime<\/a>; VI\u00a0The Science-Fictional Grotesque<\/h4>\n

These are the “mind blowing<\/a>” and “freaky<\/a>” of SF, corresponding likely to our respective awe and horror in the face of scientific developments.<\/p>\n

The sublime is a response to a shock of imaginative expansion, a complex recoil and recuperation of self-consciousness coping with phenomena suddenly perceived to be too great to be comprehended. The grotesque is a response to another sort of imaginative shock, the realization that objects that appear to be familiar and under control are actually undergoing surprising tranSFormations, conflating disparate elements not observed elsewhere in the world. The recoil and recuperation of the sublime responds to things that are overpowering and dominating; of the grotesque, to things that are near and intimate, yet that prove to be strange. With the sublime, consciousness tries to expand inward to encompass in the imagination the limits to its outward expansion of apprehension. With the grotesque, consciousness tries to project its fascinated repulsion\/attraction out into objects that it cannot accommodate, because they disturb its sense of rational, natural, and desirable order. In both, the perceiver enjoys a sudden dislocation from habitual perception. Both attitudes have been deeply connected to SF from the start, because both are concerned with the states of mind that science and art have in common: acute responsiveness to the objects of the world, the testing of the categories conventionally used to interpret the world, and the desire to articulate what consciousness finds inarticulable.\u00a0Fifth Beauty<\/em><\/small><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The author plays off\u00a0Kant’s<\/a>\u00a0definition of the sublime, differentiating between the\u00a0mathematical sublime<\/a>\u00a0and the\u00a0dynamical sublime<\/a>. The former involves the experience of infinity and is exemplified by\u00a02001: A Space Odyssey\u00a0and its celebration of the enormity of space and mind-distorting possibilities of technology and (human) development. The dynamical sublime is a response to the overwhelmingly powerful phenomenon, and an example is\u00a0The Matrix<\/em>‘s focus on the spectacle of manipulating space-time. At its vague periphery, the sublime must appear transcendent and so never fully perceived: the totality of the cosmos in\u00a02001<\/em>\u00a0and the mechanism of Neo’s power in\u00a0The Matrix<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Just as the sublime in SF is an attempt to come to terms with the absoluteness of technology or discovery (whether in its mathematical or dynamical nature), the grotesque in SF is an attempt to appreciate the intersecting fields of technology\/discovery. The sublime looks at the transcendental outlines of science, the grotesque at its category-defying permutations. Hence the cyborgs and aliens in SF, as well as the appearances of the absurd in SF.<\/p>\n

VII\u00a0The Technologiade<\/h4>\n

The\u00a0technologiade<\/em>\u00a0forms a somewhat ambiguous and apparently multifaceted dimension of SF. The technologiade is the form of the SF story: “an epic of the struggle of the tranSFormation of the cosmos into a technological regime”.<\/p>\n

This chapter has a somewhat\u00a0ad hoc<\/em>\u00a0feel to it and betrays an obsession with categorization which ironically makes the categorization of the “seven beauties” appear all the more arbitrary. The chapter begins by explaining the technologiade manifests itself through the\u00a0space opera\u00a0and the\u00a0adventure story, and then proceeds to describe half-a-dozen motifs often found in the latter, ranging from “wife at home” to “handy man”.<\/p>\n

\n

Final comments and review:<\/strong>\u00a0This is undoubtedly an enjoyable and recommended read. The author is inevitably descended (and likely still partially rooted) in a tradition of\u00a0critical theory\u00a0– which I blatantly dislike – but manages to keep his hands out of his pants for the most part. Insofar as “what is book good for”, I’d suggest that it offers criteria to explain our responses to SF. It’s not uncommon to know that one SF work is preferred to another without being able to articulate why. I find it interesting to think about how these aspects of SF fit into my own preferences. Why do I prefer X to Y? How do they differ in their capacity as SF, and what does that difference, tied in my preferences, say about my expectations for SF?<\/p>\n

\n

[1]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0“SF” is contrasted with\u00a0sci-fi; the latter referring (according to purists such the author of this book) to\u00a0pop-science\u00a0fiction with makes up the majority of\u00a0Hollywood<\/a>\u00a0science fiction and which uses the fiction of science primarily for its\u00a0d\u00e9cor value.<\/p>\n

tanktop<\/a>\u00a0put me onto\u00a0this<\/a>\u00a0review, it’s worth linking to for a couple of reasons: it gives a good explanation of how this book differs from previous SF literary theory books; it mentions a number of flaws and limitations (incl. paucity of examples, omissions, and the poor nature of the last chapter); and finally, it has a useful categorization of the seven beauties.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Seven Beauties of\u00a0Science Fiction\u00a0is a book written by\u00a0Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr, a professor of English at\u00a0DePauw University\u00a0and published in 2008. I wanted to have a bird’s eye view; I ended up in outer space.\u00a0(Preface) There’s something\u00a0inexpressible\u00a0about\u00a0SF[1]. This\u00a0inexpressible something, the author suggests, reflects the role of SF in helping us parse and express the role and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[159,198,204,93],"tags":[],"metadata":[158],"class_list":["post-1759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-posts","category-book-review","category-everything2","category-sci-fi","metadata-shai_footnotes"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2439,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2011\/05\/03\/stargate-universe\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":0},"title":"Stargate Universe","author":"Pala","date":"May 3, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Editorial notes: This Essay was found as a 'draft' entry in Everything2. It was last updated on 03\/05\/2011. I've always been sympathetic to science fiction, but never really ever loved any of its progeny. For example, I'll always have fond feelings towards Star Trek: The Next Generation\u00a0for its naive utopianism,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1729,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2010\/11\/29\/the-algebraist-br-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":1},"title":"The Algebraist (BR)","author":"Pala","date":"November 29, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"The Algebraist\u00a0is a science fiction novel set in the unfathomably far future and is penned by the established author\u00a0Iain M. Banks. The plot concerns a star system being attacked by some force, (I would have written \"alien force\" but by this stage in the universe's history to define something as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1761,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2011\/01\/29\/revelation-space-universe-br-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":2},"title":"Revelation Space Universe (BR)","author":"Pala","date":"January 29, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"The\u00a0mythology\u00a0and\u00a0history\u00a0shared by many of\u00a0Alastair Reynolds' books has been called the\u00a0Revelation Space Universe\u00a0(RSU). The world gets its name from the first book to feature it, namely\u00a0Revelation Space. RSU and space opera: Reynolds writes\u00a0space opera, which to me means stories that contrast the heroic\u00a0individuality\u00a0of the protagonist against the enormity of space. That\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1734,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2010\/12\/01\/decoding-the-heavens-br-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":3},"title":"Decoding the Heavens (BR)","author":"Pala","date":"December 1, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Editorial notes: This is the first of two posts (bost written on the same day) dedicated to the Antikythera mechanism. Decoding the Heavens\u00a0is a non-fiction book by\u00a0Jo Marchant\u00a0about the\u00a0Antikythera mechanism, and was published in 2008. For the actual focus of the book,\u00a0see the relevant node, although suffice to remind everyone\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2697,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2013\/11\/25\/monday-november-25-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":4},"title":"Monday November 25, 2013","author":"Pala","date":"November 25, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Now\" keeps changing, leading me to doubt whether it ever is. Contents: Philosopher Brief: Christian Wolff - Take 3\u00a0 Diary: Studying Java and Wibit on programming\u00a0 Some words on Scaruffi: Gaining perspective on chapter 4 - Part 2 Philosopher Brief: Christian Wolff - Take 3 Meta: Title notwithstanding, and long-story\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251,"url":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/2014\/10\/28\/thinking-about-hegels-reason\/","url_meta":{"origin":1759,"position":5},"title":"Thinking about Hegel’s “Reason”","author":"Pala","date":"October 28, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The significance of Reason was not immediately\u00a0apparent for me. At first it seemed no different, except by semantic quibbles, from thought. In retrospect this occurred because when I scrutinized\u00a0what would be a mind that self-defined as Reason, what I was actually considering\u00a0was a rational mind. And a rational mind could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "All Posts"","block_context":{"text":"All Posts","link":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/all-posts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/padotI-sn","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1759\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1759"},{"taxonomy":"metadata","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/metadata?post=1759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}