![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thetravellerslastjourney.com\/shai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/kisspng-black-and-white-monochrome-grey-divider-5ab8b367372326.6136383115220539912259-300x15.png?resize=300%2C15\")
\n{Part 1 – 14\/03\/2017}<\/p>\n
\n{Part 1 – 14\/03\/2017}<\/p>\n
There is a universal dialectical tension between any directed endeavour – whether the navigation of techno-sociological progression by modern nation-states (nb. truthfully, these compasses are biased towards “economic progression”), or a religious roadmap, the archetype of which is the Torah and Oral Law.<\/p>\n
Freedom vs Restriction
\nBoth self-annihilate on their own.<\/p>\n
[Here I try to explore the way otiyot<\/em> within a passuk<\/em> can inform each other so that the complexity of individual words is individualized within their context]\n [I feel like this is dangling open since I don’t understand anything about silver sockets and washbasin]<\/span><\/p>\n Synopsis:<\/p>\n Synopsis expanded:<\/p>\n Appendix I: Words of interest<\/strong><\/p>\n [Will be referring to very specific parts within this, not to all]\n Tisa = 10III-9III-1I<\/p>\n Pei-kuf-daled<\/em> = 8II-10II-4I (C)<\/p>\n Lifkodeihem<\/em> (A) & Bifkod<\/em> (B)<\/p>\n Negef<\/em> = 5II-3I-8IV<\/p>\n Met<\/em> = 4II-10III<\/p>\n Appendix II:<\/strong><\/p>\n Vatisa<\/em> vs Vaira<\/em>: We lift our eyes to see what will come. (Nb. Vayar H-shem<\/em> regarding Avraham after Brit Mila<\/em>).<\/p>\n [Cf. Breisheit:24:63&64 But Vaira is taught in regards to seeing (metaphorically, “seeing with third eye”, or akin to seeing Scheena on Shabat, I wonder)… lift our expectation\/dreaming\/vision to see (cf. like a schizophrenic looks expectantly for signs of a conspiracy) [the paranoid’s conspiracy exists as a static entity only in the shape\u00a0between the shapes<\/em>, i.e. shapes that show as the objects of their evidence]. Here Moshe (nb. sum of 600,000) (see note on Tezaveh<\/em>) lifts Israel in this way].<\/p>\n Errata:<\/p>\n In a hallmark-card (v. v. crude) nutshell: Don’t count me\/we, rather, ensure that I\/us are contributing to the construction of (the interface to) infinity (i.e. towards Infinite)<\/p>\n Should be:<\/p>\n In a hallmark-card (v. v. crude) nutshell: Don’t count me\/we, rather, ensure that I\/us are contributing half-shekel<\/strong> to the construction of (the interface to) infinity (i.e. towards Infinite). This way we all walk arm-in-arm, paradox that we should walk at different paces. Regarding nations, individuals, etc. (Nb. regarding what is good, not as an excuse for evil in its own right<\/u>, cf. effort to self-rectify which is a measure of good).<\/p>\n Can look at this:<\/p>\n Expanded synopsis:<\/p>\n Appendix 1:<\/strong><\/p>\n Otiyot<\/em> of Yisrael<\/em>: 10I-9III-8III-1I-3II<\/p>\n A hand hooks for the purpose of:<\/p>\n A perception of unity (shin like shalom, but here seen from below as a simple unity, when in fact it is complicated) It is also the battle against our lesser-self (which nonetheless is powerful; Esav), in the way that we win it.It is also the crossing of the river of integrating our whole (habits vs ideas; via emotions).<\/p>\n Appendix 2: Gera<\/strong><\/p>\n Shekel<\/em> is 20 gera<\/em>, half is ten.<\/p>\n The shekel<\/em> is physically allocated economic\/system value component:<\/p>\n Something that has the ability to unite (shin<\/em>) into a thing (aleph<\/em>*) which appears as a connection to a higher purpose (kuf<\/em>) which when expressed (aleph<\/em>) is a mode of communication (lamed<\/em>). The amount is alluded in the same of daled<\/em> and mem<\/em> which is also prominent as space upon which the kuf<\/em> sits. These are “amount of opportunity” and “potential energy”.<\/p>\n * Aleph<\/em>-space is pertinent because kuf<\/em> is next, if it were lamed next, then gimmel space would be more pertinent, but also even if samech<\/em> or vav were next the gimmel space would be more pertinent. But for this reason when thinking of shin-to-lamed in shekel, can be worthwhile to look at gimmel space therein, but more clear would be to look at lamed space per se (for reasons of being in olam<\/em> briya<\/em>). This can be seen as the space of ashes left after a fire. Currency is the most far-reaching means of connection employed by Homo sapiens.<\/p>\n The difference from gera<\/em> can be seen by analogy with a difference in modern vs ancient currency systems.<\/p>\n Modern systems are more likely to employ trinkets which devalue utterly. This does not invalidate them, but it makes it easier to see the difference between shekel and gera.<\/p>\n The half-shekel<\/em> in one opinion is given as the common “half denomination coin”, e.g. 50c.<\/p>\n But this is also measured as a minimal effort required to produce. Which normally are the same. (Aka: the lowest common currency would be the lowest effort-amount valued, in a world that was somehow fair in selling effort for currency).<\/p>\n Appendix 3: Ci’or<\/em>, rachatzu<\/em>, yad<\/em> vs regel<\/em>, nechoshet<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Ci’or<\/strong> – 2II-10I-6I-8III.<\/p>\n See two images, one at a time:<\/p>\n Now see them as symmetrical.<\/p>\n Analogy<\/u>: A thing which takes a shape for a purpose; making it that way is the same as the possibility<\/em> which it reveals (of bathing in a container) (out of all the possible<\/em> ways it could have been shaped).<\/p>\n Rachatz<\/strong> <\/em>(related word) – 8III-8II-9IV<\/p>\n Analogy<\/u>: Using different ways of contorting and impacting hands beneath running ways, as iterations within a loop of repeated actions which become a means for concentrating the washed-hands into their more essential (less redundant contents) matter.<\/p>\n Yad<\/strong> <\/em>– 10I-4I<\/p>\n E.g. The things in life which we control\/interact.<\/p>\n Regel<\/strong> <\/em>– 8III-3I-3II<\/p>\n E.g. The things in life which (we navigate with, but also which) “follow our feet”<\/p>\n Can think of these two as:<\/p>\n Nechoshet<\/strong> <\/em>– 5II-8I-9III-10III<\/p>\n See two images one at a time:<\/p>\n These are symmetrical.<\/p>\n Nechoshet as copper is the metal manifestation of \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
{Part 2 – 14\/03\/2017}<\/p>\n{Part 3 – 16\/03\/2017}<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nwhich brings about the path found, a way of navigating possibilities
\nwhich brings about an expression into the world
\nwhich connects. (Lamed).<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n